Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Using a Sample Essay For a Career, Long Term Goals, and College

Using a Sample Essay For a Career, Long Term Goals, and CollegeSample essays are an important part of a student's preparation for college and high school courses. While having the chance to learn how to write a sample essay may be more than enough in itself, a long term goal should also be included. It is always good to have a way to measure the effectiveness of a high school student's essay writing.A sample essay is only as good as the writing skill of the person who wrote it. For this reason, if a student does not write the exact same essay each year, they need to learn how to prepare a new one. In some cases, this may be as simple as reviewing the samples the students were given in previous years.The high school or college students preparing for careers may also find this type of exercise useful. Writing for a sample essay is an opportunity to get a feel for what it would be like to write for a different audience. This experience can also be helpful to students who are preparing f or college courses and college admissions tests.The test itself is a great opportunity to review materials students may have already read in college courses. If a student has only gone through one year of high school or college, they should take the time to review what they have learned over the years. However, if a student is looking for a major break, including a sample essay as part of their overall preparation can be invaluable.By taking this approach, the students will also have a better idea of how to go about preparing for college and career courses, long term goals, and how to communicate their ideas to a reader. Sometimes, it is a good idea to focus on the skills students will need to have when they are older. They will have had ample experience with writing, however, it is also important to consider the lessons that they learned while writing the essay.Students should do some research on the different ways to do this. Whether the student wants to write a full curriculum es say, a class assignment, or a thesis statement, it is always a good idea to follow a model that works well for them. There are many different styles that can be used, so it is always good to be flexible about the choice of template.Most of the students who are aiming for careers, long term goals, and college should try a number of templates before settling on one. Even if they are unsure about how a particular style will affect their career, it can still be a good idea to see how well it works with their general writing style. It can be easier to improve a style than it is to figure out what it was all about.Even though a career, long term goals, and college student can use the sample essay as a starting point, it is not necessarily the best starting point. A better choice may be to consult with someone experienced in writing for essay. For this reason, the students can learn more about the types of templates that will best fit their needs.

Analysis on the McLaren Group

Executive Summary There are market entry barriers for new entrants in the car market such as McLaren. The report shows that the industry has grown over the years to become one of the most competitive becoming a struggle for new entrant. The entrants face numerous challenges before they dominate or even penetrate the car market.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Analysis on the McLaren Group specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The already existing companies in the car market are trying to develop new measures and strategies that will allow them to remain relevant in the market amidst economic slow growth and a decline in demand. These include diversification and investment in other areas to reduce risks. McLaren has been able to overcome most of the entry barriers to become a successful company despite the competiveness of the industry. Introduction The automotive industry has both good and tough times, which result t o times of growth and decline. The industry is highly competitive which poses a great challenge for new entrants and existing companies. Most of the entry barriers present in the mass car market is relevant to McLaren though they do not indicate a negative impact on the McLaren Group, which continues to establish new companies. The major challenges for new entrants include enormous upfront costs, high competition and marketing of the new brands. The market is not well-exploited owing to the challenges that face existing and new companies. It is beyond doubt that McLaren has been able to overcome the various market entry barriers present in the mass car market as evident from its dominance and high returns. Competition is a relevant market entry barrier for the company, which has been keen on identifying strategic groups that have similar business models and similar strategies in the car market. This is important in identifying its direct competitors and the basis on which they compe te and identify any opportunities. The company has been able to keep up with its main competitors such as Ferrari owing to sufficient market research, which identifies major areas of improvement and competitive advantage. For example, the company is making cars that are faster, comfortable and economical in an effort to compete with its main rivals. It uses product development articulated by Ansoff’s Matrix to introduce new products into existing market to boost competition against its rivals (Kerr 2005, p. 156). The enormous amount of capital to start a car company is another relevant market entry barrier for McLaren. The company was able to amass huge capital from its initial investors such as Bruce McLaren, shareholders and external financial assistance from banks and other financial institutions.Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More It was able to establish other segm ents such as Absolute Taste from the huge revenues generated by the racing team. The company, which started as a racing team, has been able to divert its returns to fund and establish new segments such as McLaren Applied Technologies and McLaren Electronic Systems that are a source of huge revenues (Young 2005, p. 58). Marketing investment is a market entry barrier for McLaren owing to the expense and challenges of marketing a new brand in an existing market. McLaren was able to prioritize its expenditure budget by dedicating a significant amount of money to extensive advertisement to create awareness of the brand. It was able to advertise itself further by becoming one of the most successful Formula 1 team by recording grand prix victories thus creating more awareness of the brand. The company teams up with other companies such as Mercedes to boost its image and have a competitive advantage (Gray Gray 2000, p. 32). The company was able to develop its own manufacturing line and pro duction center to carter for its needs for limited capacity of part suppliers. This ensures that it has access to spare parts that it needs since it has its own manufacturing and production line. Other relevant entry barriers include government regulations and patent protection laws that may prevent use of certain innovations. McLarens develops its products in accordance to the government regulations regarding safety and fuel efficiency through the development of cars that meet such standards. This is possible owing to use of high and competent employees that are conversant with the regulations. McLaren Group is not only involved in Formula 1 or sports cars but it is involved in other businesses off the track. It is able to generate around  £ 33 million in annual profits from its companies, which constitute its portfolio (www.worksmart.org.uk). It has shown a high level of diversification with the establishment of six separate companies in different markets, which constitute its p ortfolio. According to the Ansoff’s matrix, McLaren embraces diversification by developing new products and offer them to new markets (Kerr 2005, p. 159). The company’s diversification is a departure from its initial existing product and market involvement, which is Formula 1 racing. There are six different companies in the portfolio including McLaren racing, McLaren marketing, McLaren Electronic Systems, McLaren Automotive, McLaren Applied Technologies and Absolute taste.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Analysis on the McLaren Group specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The companies within the Group’s portfolio increase its value through increased returns and market share. The Group has a clear foresight by establishing a portfolio of companies that produce related products and others that produce non-related products. It is able to increase its market value while spreading out the risk and sa ves costs by utilizing its resources. The companies within the portfolio enjoy self-governance though there is the overall management, which looks at the management at the Group level. The Group integrates all companies into its management and uses similar development and management strategies (Sadler 2003, p. 14). McLaren racing is a successful team in the grand prix motor racing with major victories since its establishment in 1966. The McLaren Formula 1 team is the backbone of McLaren Company, which brings in huge revenues. McLaren Automotive is a state of art automotive production line, which is responsible for the production of the company’s vehicles. McLaren Electronic system is the company, which is responsible for the supply of electronic control unit to the Formula 1 team. It also produces electronic systems for teams and championships especially in North America and Europe. McLaren Applied Technologies uses Informational Technology and Data management expertise to he lp Formula 1 team improve on their performance. In addition, the Group has opened a new  £40 million production center to boost its production. Absolute Taste offers both catering and hospitality services to guests in Formula 1 race and specializes in events and party hosting around the world. The Group’s portfolio consists of McLaren Marketing, which is responsible for advertisement and creating awareness of the brand. It is important to note that McLaren diversifies but builds and holds on some products such as racing to increase market share or maintain current market share according to Boston and Ansoff Matrix (Levine Tyson 1990, p. 16). There exists either a direct or an indirect relationship between the companies under the McLaren group of companies. The portfolio stretches well with companies indulging in different markets such as food and hospitality though the major companies indulge in the car market and related services. The presence of six companies is a clear indication of the high levels of diversification within the McLaren Group (Gray Gray 2000, p. 68).Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More There is a high relatedness rate among the companies, which support each other financially and logistically. The Group concentrates on product development and differentiation to develop companies in its portfolio that provide related products and services. This allows the company to save on huge upfront costs and divert expenditure to develop its own companies. This allows the companies in the portfolio to integrate its activities and offer support.. There are several reasons why McLarens developed the portfolio to include other companies. The main reason is to boost its dominance and achieve synergy by developing related companies and products (Sadler 2003, p. 56). In addition, the company stretched out the portfolio to reduce risks related to economic uncertainties. The Group aims at achieving strategic fit with complementary marketing, manufacturing and production efforts. The Group’s most companies are directly related where the companies are able offer support to other c ompanies. McLaren group is able to save huge amounts of money, which it would use by seeking external assistance from other companies. For example, McLaren Electronic systems supply the team members with high-end electronics that aid them in their competition. The diversification allows the company to have a competitive advantage over its competitors by developing new companies and new products. The group benefits by heavily investing in technology and electronics, which is essential in the car market, and racing industry. The portfolio is possible owing to the Group’s already existing resources and high levels of brand loyalty. The Group finds it important to invest in other non-related markets such as Absolute Taste to spread its risks and try to mitigate the effects of financial, political and other risks. The company, which is not directly related to the car market is source of revenue and increases the Groups asset base. In addition, McLaren has a safe level of diversifi cation as articulated by the portfolio’s composition or configuration. The companies in the portfolio have a high level of relatedness where it is possible to share assets and resources. The companies are able to share resources such as technology and the Group’s assets to carry out their business endeavors (Levine Tyson 1990, p. 39). Most of the companies relate in terms of products and services meaning that there is lots of cooperation between them.However, each company is in an effort to secure its own assets and develop its resources. There is a positive correlation between portfolio of assets and the creation of value for the company. McLaren group is able to add value by diversifying its businesses making it effective in resource and capital utilization. It increases value by investing its returns on other businesses that have the capacity to grow and contribute to the value of the group. There is a large value of bundle assets and business compared to independe nt unit owing to huge asset base, which can attract more financial assistance. McLaren also enjoys large market share and asset dominance. McLaren has a unique approach to diversification, which is partially different from the historic perspective on corporate diversification. Over the years, there has been a change in the approach of diversification owing to new research and change in strategies. The trends in corporate diversification have been changing due to the change in the economy and continued research on the concepts. The Group realizes the dynamics in the approach to diversification and the numerous benefits of applying different diversification concepts. In early 1950’s, companies were diversifying mainly due to management competencies through portfolio planning techniques (Goold Luchs 1993, p. 10). This has been changing as companies concentrate on the effect of diversification on performance. The companies have a deep thinking and understanding of diversificatio n and its effect on the company’s performance. They are concentrating more on performance measurement after diversification to determine the benefits of diversification. In the late 1980’s companies were using value based planning concepts to scrutinize diversification and make concrete decisions. Goold Luchs (1993, p. 20) says that in the early 1990’s companies were diversifying through the establishment of companies that produce related products. This move supported good performance where companies improved on returns and profitability. Later in the years, companies started using core competencies and dominant logics as a driving factor for diversification. It is important to note that some approaches of the concept of diversification come and go. Companies are going back in time to incorporate strategies of diversification with the current strategies in an effort to come up with the best diversification approach. It is important to note that companies such a s McLaren incorporate more than one diversification approach to maximize its benefits. Consequently, companies are concentrating on performance measurement to determine whether the diversification strategy is beneficial. Although research indicates that diversification leads to higher performance, companies appreciate that unrelated extensively diversified companies have a poor performance. In the early year, companies were not carrying out performance measurement on diversification since they believed to have high performance. The approach of diversification by McLaren reflects on the historical perspective on corporate diversification where there was focus on the role of corporate headquarters. In the early years, companies did focus on corporate headquarters to determine their role in case of diversification. This is evident in McLaren scenario where the corporate headquarters have a big role to play in diversification of the company and marketing of products (Reed 2010, p. 2). T he historical perspective on corporate diversification insists on sticking to the diversification strategy and executing the outlined strategy. There is a strong relationship between the historical approach of diversification and that of McLaren. This is because the company insists on performance measurement of the diversification process. Conclusion McLaren Group has proven to be one of the most successful companies in the highly competitive car market industry. This is evident from its growth over years and its continued dominance in the industry. It is able to overcome market entry barriers through different mechanisms that ensure its relevance and success in the industry. McLaren is one of the few companies that have been able to overcome market entry challenges and increase its portfolio of companies as a means of market penetration. The diversification of its business operations are one of the major contributors of its success. McLaren has seen the benefits of relating diversi fication and performance as proven by Goold and Luchs (1993, p. 45). It has a review of past diversification concepts to establish the best and outstanding diversification approach. McLaren has a high level of diversification with a Group portfolio consisting of six companies. This is one of the main reasons for the continued growth and success of the Group where it plans to invest  £750 million over 5 years (Reed 2010, p. 2). References Goold, M Luchs, K 1993, ‘Why diversify? Four decades of management thinking’, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 7 no. 3, pp.7- 25. Gray, A Gray, T 2000, Studies in Economics and Business: Marketing, Heinemann Publishers, New York. Kerr, J 2005 ‘Diversification strategies and managerial rewards’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 28 no. 6, pp. 155-179. Levine, I. Tyson, D 1990, Participation, productivity, and the firm’s environment, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. Reed, J 2010, ‘McLaren enter s sports car market’, Financial Times, vol. 2 no. 4, pp. 1-2. Sadler, P 2003, Strategic Management, Kogan Page Publishers, Washington. Young, E 2005, McLaren Memories: A Biography of Bruce McLaren Haynes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. This report on Analysis on the McLaren Group was written and submitted by user Marvin B. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Thursday, March 12, 2020

Inspector as a dramatic device Essays

Inspector as a dramatic device Essays Inspector as a dramatic device Essay Inspector as a dramatic device Essay At the start of the play, we see a well-to-do family at dinner. The mood is quite relaxed, as they are chatting politely, yet informally. They are drinking alcohol liberally. They are wearing fashions of the period, and the men are wearing tails and white ties, not dinner jackets. The family are content, maybe as they have nothing to be anxious about and everything is going fine in their lives. They have no real worries. Business is doing well for Arthur Birling, and he is in line for a possible Knight-hood. Sheila has just got herself engaged to pleasant, affluent Gerald Croft, whose father is a friendly rival in business with Arthur Birling. The family seem unified. Nobody is expecting a visit from an Inspector. Neither is anybody aware that each of them, in turn, has had connections with Eva Smith.  No one thinks their path crosses with Evas, but they are wrong. Theyve all met her, and made an impression on her life. They dont know it, but theyre in for a surprise  Surprise and shock continues throughout the play. The actual arrival of the Inspector is an initial shock. When he enters, he is extremely abrupt. He gets straight to the point and doesnt hang around. He informs Birling that two hours ago a young woman died in the Infirmary. Yes, yes. Horrid business. But I dont understand why you should come here, Inspector - says Birling. It is obvious he doesnt care about the young woman who has just taken her own life, instead, hes just apprehensive about why the Inspectors visit concerns him. His lack of compassion and sympathy is awful. Arthur Birling is always looking out for himself. No one outside of the family matters, according to him. He talks about how everyman is for himself, and that the time is a prosperous one for everyone.  The Inspectors character is a plot-mover. He moves the story along, and gets the audience to focus. He is sort of like an explorer, as he gets the characters searching and interrogating themselves and each other. When its Sheilas turn for questioning, and the Inspector shows her the photo of Eva, it causes her to scream and run out. Firstly, Sheila is truly shocked to hear that the girl has died, and secondly, the audience wants to see what has caused her to behave in such a way.  The Inspector also shows Gerald a photograph. By showing each one a photo, he spotlights each ones importance. He also creates an air of mystery, because none of the characters are sure, that they all see the same photograph.  When its Mrs Birlings turn for the investigation, she does her best to be stubborn, and tries to be clever, by being dismissive and arguing her opinions strongly. The Inspector traps her into talking about how she dismissed Eva Smith, in her time of need. He is sharp, and quick, and Mrs Birling cant help falling into the trap. The Inspector uses dramatic irony here, as both Shelia and the audience can see whats coming.  The Inspector investigated each member of the family. He found that Mr Birling is self-centred, and egoistic, and that Mrs Birling is just concerned about the family, and things being proper. He also reveiled that even though Shelia was selfish, and irrational to get Eva sacked from her job, she wasnt a bad person, and was capable of feeling sympathy and compassion. Unlike her parents. He found Eric to be a lost boy who felt he couldnt depend on his parents. He said that Mr Birling wasnt the kind of father a chap could go to when hes in trouble. Priestley chose to set this play around a family, which is apparently united and well to do, which may in fact not be as secure as it looked. The children, Eric and Sheila share different views to their parents, to show that maybe a new generation may be more compassionate towards others, so the future may be brighter  You see, Priestley was a socialist. When you have time to reflect on the story afterwards, you start to wonder if Priestley was using the Inspector as a mouthpiece, as a way of voicing and expressing his opinions and views. Priestley believed that co-operation in society is necessary for things to advance. This is everything Arthur Birling disagrees with. He thinks that everyman is for himself. I think the Inspector was part of the mystery. When its relieved that he isnt a real Inspector, we start to question the play. We look to find answers. Was he a ghost? A murderer? Eva Smiths brother? But then we find out that a suicide did take place, and there will be questioning, the drama continues  The message of the play is, that we all have to help each other and look out for each other. The actions that we portray in society, if handled badly may end in disaster. We are members of one body and we are responsible for each other.

Monday, February 24, 2020

Microsoft vs. Apple OS Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Microsoft vs. Apple OS - Research Paper Example Operating systems handles the details of the interaction between the user and the hardware. The operating systems are generally used in nearly all computing devices ranging from desktop computers to video games. There basically two prominent operating systems that exist for various functions and professionals; Microsoft windows and the Apple operating system. Depending on the function, the two operating systems exhibit some dissimilarity. For example, for architects and landscape architects, Microsoft windows has traditionally been one of the dominant operating system as it is compatible with a variety of programs relevant to the field such as the Autodesk AutoCAD (Cantrell & Michaels CHAP 1). The operating system OS X and Windows are two different types of operating systems that are created by Apple and the Microsoft companies respectively. The operating system OS X will run on Apple hardware only otherwise referred to as Mac computers, but Windows operating system will run on almos t any compatible hardware referred to as PC computers as well as those produced by Apple organization. Most people who prefer the Apple Mac computers operating on the apple OS X platform argue that Mac accessories are more reliable, that is, they are less prone to program crashing or unexpected shut-downs than PCs which operate on the Microsoft windows platform. However, this remains to a matter to be debated upon by proponents of both operating systems. According to a consumer report survey of laptop computers for the year 2008, two computer gadgets emerged out as the best laptop brands (Peterka pp17-19). These were Mac manufactured by Apple and the Lenovo which incidentally runs on the Microsoft windows operating system. But of the two, Lenovo had a better score than the former in terms of reliability. The Mac on the contrary also recorded a higher score than Lenovo in terms client service and satisfaction. Arguments have therefore erupted as to which operating system is more supe rior to the other. Microsoft windows operating system on the other hand, is a computer software developed by the Microsoft corporation. It is indeed among the leading personal computing platform. The organization’s nature of allowing for the licensing of its windows software products to some firms that have been in the computer manufacturing business, has been the key factor that has seen to Microsoft domination in the computer market. In most cases, Microsoft windows has work in hand in hand with other giant computer manufacturing firms such as HP, Toshiba, Dell and many others. They have availed some of their hardware to virtually all computer users owing to their high compatibility with a variety of computer sets (Silverman pp5-10). The ease of availability of Microsoft products has therefore means that the organization greatly benefits from economies of scale in a way that the cost of these products becomes less expensive. This consequently implies that Microsoft operatin g system based computer products are affordable and easily accessible when compared to the Apple Macs. The affordability of Microsoft products has also been associated with certain stumbling blocks. For instance, through Microsoft’s ever willingness to partner with virtually any party intending to do computer related business activities, the company is therefore usually obliged to carry out all that is within its premise to ascertain that their clients are able to get a Microsoft software that is compatible with the new hardware that the partner company is manufacturing. This might the cost the company a great deal in terms of constant updating of its products which may put the Microsoft Corporation at a shear point of bloating. Also, Microsoft operating system has won the favor of the majority of people owing to the fact that more often than not, it usually ensures that its even its newer operating system can still be compatible even with the older operating system. However, but just like other case, this has also

Saturday, February 8, 2020

European Union's State Development Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

European Union's State Development - Case Study Example (Boromisa 2004).A thorough knowledge of the impacts of the monitoring and evaluation of the candidate countries is indispensable for a the success of the upcoming talks in 2009 for Croatia.This is because the progress of the candidate countries is monitored and evaluated regularly once a year by the European Commission and its main findings are published in Regular Reports.Even after the candidates are have signed the Accession treaty they are still monitored.This evident from the recent "Monitoring Report of the European Commission on the State of Preparedness for EU Membership of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia" (European Commission, 2004c).When Croatia was given the candidate status it was stated by the European Council at Brussels stated that "The European Councilconfirms that the negotiations will be based on Croatia's own merits and that the pace of accession will depend solely on Croatia's progress in meeting the requirements for membership". (European Commission, 2004c).As it can be seen that Croatian candidature was already dependent upon the evaluation of its functioning of the ideals of liberty, democracy and human rights (parliament, executive, judiciary). A stable political and economic system is thus the key to Croatia's success in achieving the timely membership of the EU.For Croatia then the ultimate integration into the EU will means inclusion into the internal market, i.e. free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. (Boromisa, A. and Miki, M., 2003).Also there will be an impact upon the trade patterns followed by the removal of trade barriers (e.g. tariffs, quotas, voluntary export restrictions) and harmonization of policies (e.g. agriculture, competition, trade and industrial).Finally there will also be a multilateralization of individual free trade agreements which will require substantial adjustments to the local investment policy and regulation. It also has to be taken into account that there is a risk of delays in the ratification procedure rises with the number of the EU member.states vying for EU membership increasing. (Boromisa, A. and Miki, M., 2003). Also Croatia might have to deal with some politically tough decisions which may form the basis for the requirements for the EU like decreased public expenditure. (Frederik Sorensen 2001 ) .Current issues faced by the EU include the controversy relating to open skies agreements, and state investor disputes. The issue of Open Skies recently created many headlines and in the context of Croatian membership it can be seen that the matter is no longer economical or legal. The issue is purely political. (Frederik Sorensen 2001 ). This became a tug of war that took place between EU and USA authorities over the recent Open Skies Agreement. The Agreement aims to liberalise transatlantic airspace yet European transport Ministers were reluctant to agree to it at first as they felt it gave the US an unfair advantage over European interests and its

Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Declaration of Independence vs. Gettysburg Address Essay Example for Free

Declaration of Independence vs. Gettysburg Address Essay The Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address are glimpses into America’s history. They were written in two different time periods: America’s first years in 1776 and the Civil War in the 1800’s. Despite their time gap, they are similar because they both explain to the reader what is going on during their time period. However, the country was going through different events and so these two documents are diverse as well. Both The Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address were written during times of turmoil and change for the country. Both occurred during a time of war in which America was fighting for liberty and freedoms. During the Revolutionary War, the United States was trying to become â€Å"a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal†. It was battling for independence and the right to govern them in a way that would actually benefit the country and its people. So in 1776 when The Declaration of Independence was written, the country fought for freedom for themselves. During the Civil War, the country was divided in two, one half of the country fighting against the other half. They were independent as a country, but this time they were fighting for freedom for others—the African-American slaves. In a way though, America was fighting for equality both times. The first was equal treatment for the British citizens and American colonists. The second time, the country was fighting for equal treatment for all men, no matter what skin color. Both these eras were a time of testing for the United States. The Revolutionary War period determined whether the states would actually be able to achieve independence. The Civil War was a test to see if America would be able to keep that independence. President Abraham Lincoln spoke about this in his Gettysburg Address: â€Å"we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure†. These two documents are similar because they are both written about a time of battle which tested America’s strength. The Declaration of Independence and Gettysburg Address are different for several reasons. For one, The Declaration of Independence is a statement while the Gettysburg Address was a speech. The authors were also targeting different audiences. The Declaration of Independence was written mostly for themselves, but also for the British government. The Declaration stated the sentiments of the thirteen colonies and â€Å"the causes which impel them to the separation†. This clarified where the people stood in regards to their independence. This was for the benefit and organization of the country, but also for the British to know that the Americans were not giving up on independence. The Gettysburg Address was a speech given by President Abraham Lincoln to the people of America. The Civil War was not an international conflict, but rather one inside the nation. The speech was aimed for encouraging and touching the hearts of the American people. Lincoln wanted them to not give up on the cause they were fighting for, but â€Å"to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us†. In the Gettysburg Address, the president was appealing to the people’s emotions in order to boost their war effort. This is another difference it has with The Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence appealed to the British government about rights that the people ought to have. The tone of the Gettysburg Address is more personal since Lincoln’s goal was to encourage the people. Lincoln achieves a personal tone by speaking about the brave men who fought in the recent battle. The Declaration of Independence, on the other hand, was written as a political document with a formal tone. It lists the main reasons why the people were demanding independence, which were mostly due to Great Britain’s offenses against the colonies. The Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address are very distinct because they were appealing to different audiences and written in different tones. The Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address have several similarities and differences. Although they were written during different time periods, they both fight for liberty, freedom, and equality. However, the two documents, one a statement and the other a letter, were targeted at different audiences. This results in differing tones. One thing similar, both documents were written with a courage and passion for the goal it was fighting for.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Understanding Culture Essay -- Sociology

Culture, is defined by Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary, as "the integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon man's capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations." People learn about culture through interaction rather than through the memorization of a text. To become fluent in any one culture you have to experience it and become involved. There are many ways that a culture can be shared among people without them being fluent in it such as through: food, customs, clothing, language, beliefs, and behaviors. With the increase of technology and new discoveries about the world developing daily it makes it impossible for cultures to remain stagnant; therefore, they must learn how to adapt in order to survive. Some people argue that complete cultural fluency in more than one culture is impossible. However, culture is a learned behavior therefore people should be able to learn and become fluent in more than one. Culture is distinctly human and is transmitted through learning traditions and customs that govern behavior. Cultural anthropologists study human society and culture through describing, analyzing, interpreting and explaining social and cultural similarities and differences. To study and interpret cultural diversity they engage in two activities which are ethnography and ethnology. Ethnography is based on fieldwork while ethnology is based on cross-cultural comparisons of the information collected through ethnography. The studies done on culture can be shared in two ways: first through theoretical or academic anthropology and second through practical or applied anthropology. An example of academic anthropology, which teaches us about culture, is a textbook ... ...nity. An example is the way they raised and slaughtered animals rather than buying them packaged at a store. Although a year may not be enough time to become fluent in a culture, the stories of the students living abroad prove that a person can learn and become part of more than one culture. Culture is what defines the difference between humans and animals. We grow up in a culture which influences who we are and how we live. Through studying different cultures we learn more about our own culture, ourselves, our strengths, and weaknesses. Yet to become fluent a person cannot simply study a culture, rather they must be on an interactive level and experience the culture first hand. Sources Cited http://www.merriam-webster.com/ Kottak, Conrad "Cultural Anthropology: Appreciating Cultural Diversity." McGraw-Hill Education; 15 edition, October 11, 2012